Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

Texas capital tangled in textiles recycling dispute

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
February 7, 2017
in Recycling

An effort in Austin to collect clothes at the curb aims to bolster convenience for residents, but nonprofit groups say it does so at the expense of established social programs.

The city launched curbside textiles collection on Dec. 5, contracting with Ohio-based Simple Recycling for collection and processing of clothing and other textiles. Austin, a city of nearly 890,000 residents, represents the largest city yet to contract with the company. Simple Recycle provides its services in more than 50 other communities.

Austin’s goal is to divert much of the roughly 3,300 tons of textiles that are disposed in a landfill annually. The city has a roughly 42 percent diversion rate for those materials, according to the most recent figures, and its target is 75 percent by 2020.

Under Simple Recycling’s business model, the service is provided for free to the taxpayers. According to the city, the company will pay the city $20 per ton for collected material, sell the collected items and keep the remaining profits. The material is collected on the same day and week as customers’ regular curbside recycling collection. Simple Recycling trucks pick up the material and take it to a warehouse for sorting.

According to a January memo from the city manager to the Austin City Council, after the launch, members of the nonprofit and reuse business community “voiced concern that the service might negatively impact donations to their organizations” and asked that the service be ended.

The city can cancel its three-year contract with the company without cause, but if it does, Austin can’t begin a similar program for three years. Public funds might also be on the line to reimburse Simple Recycling for start-up costs, terminated contracts and personnel expenses.

Drop in donations

The city council met last week to make a decision. Austin Resource Recovery, the city’s solid waste department, recommended the contract be allowed to continue, given the downsides of termination. The council voted to allow the contract to continue, but also to have the city manager look into options for amending the contract and to report back within six months with more information. In the meantime, the city plans to initiate a program that encourages households to donate usable items to local nonprofit organizations.

Representatives of numerous nonprofit organizations urged the council to cancel the contract immediately. They explained that not only do they already reduce textile waste through accepting donations, but the new program reduces revenue that funds the social services they provide.

“We are taking textiles, the very things that go in those (Simple Recycling) green bags, and turning them into changed lives,” said Jan Gunter of the Salvation Army.

The nonprofit groups said Simple Recycling doesn’t accept anything that non-profit thrift stores can’t accept.

“So it’s really a matter of convenience for folks, and whether that convenience is getting more things to the landfill,” Alison Alter, a city council member, said at the meeting.

Targeting waste, not donations

Simple Recycling founder Adam Winfield told the council he supports the nonprofits and that the company’s goal is to take textiles out of the waste stream, not out of the donation stream.

“I agree that if all that material was going to those organizations there would be no place for us, but it’s not,” he said. “It’s going in the trash can and ending up in the landfill, and offering a convenient alternative to throwing it in the landfill as a last resort is why we exist.”

He added that the Austin response is the first time there has been such an outcry over his company’s presence.

 

Tomra MRP

Tags: CollectionLocal ProgramsPolicy Now
TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

Three-bill package aims to revamp Michigan’s bottle return system

byStefanie Valentic
June 9, 2026

Michigan lawmakers introduced a bipartisan three-bill package aimed at strengthening consumer access to bottle deposit refunds and clarifying retailer obligations...

House resolution aims to make recyclability central to product design

NY EPR bill fails to advance after third try

byStefanie Valentic
June 8, 2026

This marks the third session in which the bill cleared the Senate only to stall in the Assembly.

CalRecycle withdraws proposed regs for SB 54

Oceana, NRDC, CAW sue CalRecycle over SB 54 regs

byStefanie Valentic
June 5, 2026

The groups allege that the new regulations have too many loopholes for packaging producers.

NYC, Mack Trucks unveil winning artwork

NYC, Mack Trucks unveil winning artwork

byAntoinette Smith
June 4, 2026

The five new hand-painted waste collection trucks feature themes of honor, resilience and care, and will operate in the city's...

In My Opinion: Comparing the nation’s first packaging EPR laws

What Maine’s vape EPR law means for recyclers

byStefanie Valentic
June 4, 2026

Maine is the first state to require vape manufacturers to fund end-of-life management for their products. Vape recycler Michael Duckworth...

Our top stories from June 2021

Colorado advances EV battery EPR law

byStefanie Valentic
June 3, 2026

Colorado, which passed its Battery Stewardship Act in 2025, is now looking to close the gap on large-format, EV batteries.

Load More
Next Post

Markets improve again for residential recyclables

More Posts

How electronics legislation fared this legislative season

NY sends repairability labeling bill to governor

June 8, 2026
House resolution aims to make recyclability central to product design

NY EPR bill fails to advance after third try

June 8, 2026
Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

May 27, 2026
California extends compostable labeling law

California bills crack down on false recycling, compostable claims

May 29, 2026

Returns are a goldmine of information

May 27, 2026
Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

May 26, 2026
Data to verify recycling for Indy 500

Data to verify recycling for Indy 500

May 22, 2026
Federal PACK Act aims to preempt ‘patchwork’ of state laws

House advances Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Act

May 21, 2026

WM, Circular Materials announce new Canadian facility

May 21, 2026

Battery fires still a major risk to recyclers: report

June 9, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.