Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Plastics

Why banned shipments are still getting into Malaysia

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
April 24, 2019
in Plastics
Why banned shipments are still getting into Malaysia

Scrap plastic traders continue to circumvent import restrictions in one Southeast Asian country by labeling recovered plastic as another type of commodity.

The environmental ministry of the Malaysian government described the smuggling practices in an April 23 press conference, according to The Star newspaper. Environmental minister Yeo Bee Yin said the government conducted a two-week investigation of imports and found discrepancies in how shipments were labeled and what they actually contained.

Additionally, an examination of trade data suggests U.S. exporters are using this tactic to ship scrap plastic into Malaysia.

Last year, the government enacted import regulations to control the influx of scrap plastic, an increase that resulted from China’s ban on scrap plastic imports. One provision is Malaysia’s tight control of import licenses.

But, as Plastics Recycling Update has previously reported, traders have found other ways to continue moving material. The latest government enforcement campaign shows those practices are ongoing.

False trade codes

Exports and imports to all countries are labeled with a harmonized commodity identifier called an HS code. The code for scrap plastic is 3915, and shipments bearing that identification are subject to the Malaysian import restrictions. But, according to the environment ministry, traders are instead labeling shipments with HS code 3920, which designates a handful of finished plastic products: plates, sheets, film, foil and strip.

Yeo explained that by using the wrong code, traders ensure their shipments “don’t need a permit and can enter the country straight away,” the Star reported.

Shipments to Malaysia coded 3915 have decreased since the government enacted new regulations. But Plastics Recycling Update evaluated U.S. export figures and found that alongside that decrease, shipments to Malaysia coded 3920 have increased significantly. Although it’s unclear whether the spike is due to the false coding practice, the correlation is notable.

In December 2018, January 2019 and February 2019, the most recent months for which figures are available, U.S. exporters sent record volumes of shipments coded 3920. In December, shipments spiked from what had been an average of 1.2 million pounds per month for the preceding year to 7.5 million pounds in December alone. That was the largest monthly shipment of products coded 3920 to Malaysia on record. In January and February, they shipped 5.6 million pounds and 4.4 million pounds, respectively, of items coded 3920.

Meanwhile, scrap plastic shipments coded 3915 were down substantially year over year during those months. In February 2019, U.S. companies sent 8.9 million pounds of scrap plastic to Malaysia, which is just 18 percent of the 50.1 million pounds shipped during the same month a year earlier.

Steve Wong, executive director of the China Scrap Plastics Association, told Plastics Recycling Update that HS code 3901, which designates polyethylene resin and pellet products, is also frequently used in place of the proper scrap plastic designation.

U.S. trade figures show similar recent exponential increases in monthly U.S. shipments of material coded 3901 to Malaysia. Throughout 2017, these shipments averaged 6.9 million pounds per month. But the volume began to grow quickly in June 2018, when shipments rose from 11.3 million pounds to 36.9 million pounds. By November 2018, shipments with this code hit 97.8 million pounds. They decreased in subsequent months but remain far above the average before 2018.

Photo credit: travfoto/Shutterstock

 

Tags: AsiaTrade & Tariffs
TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

Wisconsin prepares for E-Cycle rulemaking

Reading Asia’s e-scrap recycling market through YDDL

byDavid Daoud
May 15, 2026

One Asian recycler’s latest financials offer a rare, detailed look at how downstream metals recovery from e-scrap is developing in...

APR, industry groups testify on overcapacity

APR, industry groups testify on overcapacity

byAntoinette Smith
May 8, 2026

Steve Alexander, CEO of APR, pointed to China as driving global oversupply despite fluctuating PET imports to the US and...

Volatility reshapes outlook for US metals businesses

byScott Snowden
April 15, 2026

Panelists at the ReMA conference in Las Vegas said tariffs, reshoring and geopolitical tension are remaking trade flows, lifting US...

Matium raises $8m, adds buyer financing

byAntoinette Smith
April 14, 2026

A trade finance facility from the new Erebor Bank will help bridge the gap between buyer and seller payment terms...

Why global ITAD is stranded in the Gulf

Why global ITAD is stranded in the Gulf

byDavid Daoud
March 16, 2026

As the war in Iran scrambles Middle East trade routes, Dubai’s carefully built role as a command center for global...

War-driven fuel costs compound recycling woes

War-driven fuel costs compound recycling woes

byAntoinette Smith
March 16, 2026

US and Israeli strikes in Iran and the subsequent blockade of the Strait of Hormuz have pushed diesel fuel prices...

Load More
Next Post
Apple logo on the company's headquarters in California.

Recycling takeaways from Apple's sustainability report

More Posts

Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

May 26, 2026
Fire at an EMR recycling facility in Camden, New Jersey May 29, 2026.

EMR faces shutdown calls after numerous fires

June 2, 2026
House resolution aims to make recyclability central to product design

NY EPR bill fails to advance after third try

June 8, 2026
IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

$60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

June 3, 2026
CalRecycle withdraws proposed regs for SB 54

Oceana, NRDC, CAW sue CalRecycle over SB 54 regs

June 5, 2026
The independent ITAD at a crossroads

DMD acquires ITAD firm Lifespan, outlines acquisition strategy

June 2, 2026
Our top stories from June 2021

Colorado advances EV battery EPR law

June 3, 2026
In My Opinion: Comparing the nation’s first packaging EPR laws

What Maine’s vape EPR law means for recyclers

June 4, 2026
Circular Materials to supply PlasCred chem recycling plant

Circular Materials to supply PlasCred chem recycling plant

June 4, 2026
Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

June 5, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.