Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Plastics

European panel OKs PET recycling technologies

byJared Paben
December 22, 2021
in Plastics
Company’s film line harnesses up to 90 percent PCR
Several technologies for processing post-consumer PET into food and drink packaging have been approved. | srisakorn wonglakorn/Shutterstock

A food-safety panel approved 17 applications to use Starlinger, SML and Protec technologies to recycle post-consumer PET into food and drink packaging. It rejected two other requests.

The Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP), which is part of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), issued 17 favorable opinions on PET recycling processes earlier this year. But for two other PET applications, the panel claimed it wasn’t given enough data to demonstrate the RPET would be safe for humans.

In the European Union, recycled plastics and additives can only be used in food and beverage packaging if they’re first reviewed by the EFSA for safety. Recycling companies submit applications to individual countries, which apply to the EFSA on their behalf.

Twice a year, Plastics Recycling Update covers the panel’s opinions. The most recent roundup was published in January 2021. The following are CEP determinations that have been published since then:

Starlinger DeCON

Several applications have been submitted this year to use Starlinger’s deCON technology to recycle post-consumer PET into food and drink packaging. 

The deCON process involves feeding washed and dried PET flakes into a batch reactor, where they’re preheated before they’re sent to a solid-state polycondensation (SSP) reactor, which exposes them to a vacuum and gas flow. The final product is decontaminated flakes. 

CEP adopted favorable options for all of the applications received. On Sept. 16, 2021, CEP OK’d applications from Turkish company Marmara PET Levha, Brazilian company Sulpet Plásticos, Bangladeshi company BPCL Bangladesh Petrochemical Company and Japanese company Utsumi Recycle Systems. On May 4, 2021, CEP approved applications from Italian company ISAP Packaging, Italian company ROL srl, and Croatian company Drava International. 

In all cases above, the input is hot washed and dried flakes obtained from PET containers collected at the curb, through deposit systems or via mixed-waste collection. Up to 5% can originate from non-food applications. And in all cases, the CEP concluded that the RPET could be used in 100% recycled-content food and drink packaging for long-term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill.  

Starlinger PET Direct iV+

CEP also approved a number of applications to use Starlinger’s PET Direct iV+ technology to recycle PET into pellets used in food and drink packaging.

In that process, hot caustic washed and dried flakes are fed into an extruder and pelletized. The pellets are then crystallized for a predefined time period, before they’re further heated and sent into an SPP reactor for a predefined time. The final product is decontaminated pellets. 

On Sept. 16, 2021, CEP approved an application to use the technology from Omorika Recycling of Bosnia and Herzegovina. On Aug. 27, CEP approved applications from Italian company Dentis Recycling Italy, English company ESTERPET Limited, Malaysian company Hiroyuki Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd., and Spanish company Nosoplas. On July 7, the panel approved an application from Romanian company PET Star Recycling. And on June 7, CEP approved applications from South Korean company DY Polymer and Spanish company Reciclados Industriales de Pravia. 

As is the case with the deCON applications, all of the inputs proposed in the applications above are washed and dried flakes from PET gathered through curbside, deposit or mixed-waste collection systems, and up to 5% may be from non-food containers. And, as with the deCON applicants, all sought to produce PCR for 100% recycled-content packaging for long-term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill. 

SML Technology

CEP on August 27 approved an application from Austrian company SML Maschinengesellschaft, which sought to use its SML technology to recycle post-consumer PET.

The company proposed to recycle food-grade PET containers into 50%-recycled-content beverage containers, 80%-recycled-content thermoforms for long-term food storage at room temperature, and 100%-recycled-content thermoforms for food trays exposed to frozen and refrigerated temperatures. 

In SML’s process, as in the others, the input is hot caustic washed and dried PET flakes. They are heated and crystallized at high temperature with the use of infrared lamps. Then, the flakes are dried under a flow of hot air. Finally, they are extruded with vacuum degassing to produce sheets or pellets. 

Protec process

CEP on July 7 approved an application from Spanish company Novapet to use the Protec technology to recycle post-consumer PET into 100% RPET food and drink packaging.

As is the case with the others, the input is hot washed and dried flakes from PET containers. In the Protec process, the flakes are first fed into an extruder and are pelletized. In the second step, the pellets are crystallized for a predefined residence time. In the third step, they’re introduced into a tumble dryer for SSP at high temperature under vacuum for a predefined time (this step can be operated under two different combinations of temperature and residence time). 

Alternatively, the reclaimer can skip the second step and perform crystallization of the amorphous pellets inside the tumble reactor used in the third step, followed by heating to final decontamination temperature. 

Two applications rejected 

For two other applications, CEP said it wasn’t provided enough information to prove the PET recycling processes adequately reduced contamination.

On May 6, the panel rejected an application from Australian company Martogg Group to use the EREMA Advanced technology to recycle post-consumer PET into 100%-recycled-content food and beverage packaging. The process involves feeding flakes into a continuous reactor, where they’re heated to a high temperature under vacuum. Then, they’re further decontaminated in a second continuous reactor, again at high temperature and under vacuum. Lastly, the flakes are extruded to produce pellets. 

And on March 23, CEP rejected an application from Canadian company Plastrec, which sought to use Polymetrix technology to recycle post-consumer PET into 100% RPET food containers. In that process, the washed and dried flakes are fed into an extruder and the melt is filtered. Extruded pellets are then fed to a reactor in which they are crystallized and heated up to the temperature of the next step, the SSP reactor. In the SSP reactor, the crystallized pellets are exposed to high temperature and gas glow for a predefined time. 

But in both cases, CEP determined it wasn’t provided enough detailed information by the applicants. 

“Overall, no sufficiently detailed and consistent descriptions of the process and the challenge test were received. The data and clarifications provided by the applicant did not allow an adequate evaluation of the decontamination efficiency of the process,” CEP wrote about the Martogg Group submission.

For Plastrec, the CEP concluded that, based on the information submitted to EFSA,” the applicant has not demonstrated in an adequately performed challenge test or by other appropriate evidence that the recycling process is able to reduce contamination of the PET flake input to a concentration that does not pose a risk to human health.”
 

Tags: EuropePETTechnology
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

Analysis: Undersupply of PCR is ‘stifling’ brand goals

US lawmakers urge protection of domestic RPET

byAntoinette Smith
September 25, 2026

In a letter to the US Trade Representative, five representatives asked the USTR to consider trade remedies and support verification...

Cutting healthcare plastics could save $18B

Report provides path to reduce medical e-scrap

byPaul Lane
September 25, 2026

The European report found that circularity in medical devices is possible through several potential initiatives.

E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

byDavid Daoud
September 24, 2026

Rare-earth recycling economics depend on several factors, and there is no single price or date that makes the process pencil...

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

byAntoinette Smith
September 23, 2026

The recent three-year extension for exemptions to the state's PCR mandates elicited frustration and confusion among recyclers.

Textile EPR and the definition of recycling

Textile Exchange reports progress in production

byPaul Lane
September 22, 2026

The organization said the industry has made some sustainability progress, but there’s much room for improvement.

ALPLA’s holistic approach to packaging design

ALPLA’s holistic approach to packaging design

byAntoinette Smith
September 18, 2026

The packaging and recycling company's North American design lead explains why recyclability goals can't exist in isolation.

Load More
Next Post
Brands report on their 2020 recycled plastic usage

Brands report on their 2020 recycled plastic usage

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

Oregon state capitol building with state flag and blue sky.

NAW appeals Oregon EPR ruling

September 25, 2026
Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

September 24, 2026
Analysis: Undersupply of PCR is ‘stifling’ brand goals

US lawmakers urge protection of domestic RPET

September 25, 2026
Bipartisan reps introduce bill on recycling claims

House passes bill to ease lithium-ion battery storage rules

September 24, 2026
Calif. Governor Gavin Newsom at podium.

Newsom signs battery EPR expansion, vetoes SB 54 fund bill

September 24, 2026
Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

September 23, 2026
Cutting healthcare plastics could save $18B

Report provides path to reduce medical e-scrap

September 25, 2026
Alpek closing Pennsylvania RPET plant

Alpek seizing on war-related opportunity 

July 27, 2026
Jeff Fielkow and the startup that’s building the US packaging EPR system

Jeff Fielkow and the startup that’s building the US packaging EPR system

September 10, 2026
E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

September 24, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazines

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletters

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazines
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.