Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

State looks to reduce e-scrap program revenues

byJared Paben
June 13, 2019
in E-Scrap
Laptops displayed at an electronics store.

California regulators plan to lower the fees consumers pay to fund electronics recycling. The issue? The state is accumulating too much money.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), which oversees the oldest state e-scrap recycling program in the country, is proposing to lower the fees consumers pay when they buy new electronics.

The move is in response to e-scrap processors handling significantly lower weights of regulated material in recent years. As a result, CalRecycle is paying processors less money out of the state fund, and the fund balance keeps growing.

The fees vary depending on the size of the screen. They are currently $5 for each device with a screen less than 15 inches (anything 4 inches and less is exempt), $6 for 15- to 34-inch screens and $7 for 35-plus-inch screens. At the CalRecycle monthly public meeting scheduled for June 18, the agency will consider reducing the charges to $4, $5 and $6.

Under the state program, fees are paid on purchases of new CRTs TVs and monitors (not a reality in today’s marketplace), LCD TVs and monitors, laptops and tablets with LCD screens, plasma TVs, and portable DVD players with LCD screens.

The state collects the money and uses it to pay companies that collect and recycle covered devices. CalRecycle currently provides collection and recycling payments of 49 cents per pound for CRTs and 60 cents per pound for non-CRT covered devices. It paid them a combined $53.5 million during the 2017-18 fiscal year.

All told, from Jan. 1, 2005, when the program began, through the end of 2018, the state has paid e-scrap processors about $1 billion to recycle over 2.3 billion pounds.

Dropping weights

California’s program has seen lower collection and recycling weights since 2012, but the decreases have accelerated over the past few years, in particular. Last year, CalRecycle received payment claims for just over 100 million pounds of e-scrap, down 21% from 2017, which was down 17% from 2016, which was down 13% from 2015.

“In recent years, the amount of recovered and recycled CRT devices has continued to decline significantly due to legacy stockpile depletion, at the same time as the amount of non-CRT devices increases,” CalRecycle staff wrote in a memo.

The end-of-life stream has been shifting in California for years, as the CRT wave has broken and receded. In 2013, non-CRT devices made up over 2% by weight for the first time. Fast forward to 2017, when they made up 14% by weight. Last year, non-CRT devices made up about 20% of the stream.

The shifts prompted CalRecycle to create a non-CRT payment rate last year. Previously, the agency paid processors the same rate for all covered device types.

Because CalRecycle is paying processors less out of the fund, the balance has grown. CalRecycle expects to end the 2018-19 fiscal year with a fund balance of $113.5 million, up from $110.9 million the year before.

If approved, the lower fees would go into effect starting Jan. 1, 2020, midway through the 2019-20 fiscal year, which starts July 2019 and runs through June 2020. If CalRecycle kept the current fees, it would collect about $86.5 million during the 2019-20 fiscal year. If it reduces each fee by $1, it would expect to bring in $80.9 million.

In memos, CalRecycle staff say the reduced fees will bring the fund reserve down over the next few fiscal years while still providing enough money to run the program and respond to unexpected expenses.

Photo credit: woff/Shutterstock

 

Tags: CaliforniaEPR
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

House resolution aims to make recyclability central to product design

NY EPR bill fails to advance after third try

byStefanie Valentic
June 8, 2026

This marks the third session in which the bill cleared the Senate only to stall in the Assembly.

Rainforest

Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

byBill Shireman
June 8, 2026

We have a lot to learn from jungles, particularly as we fight the thorny problem of plastic pollution.

CalRecycle withdraws proposed regs for SB 54

Oceana, NRDC, CAW sue CalRecycle over SB 54 regs

byStefanie Valentic
June 5, 2026

The groups allege that the new regulations have too many loopholes for packaging producers.

Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

bySarah Edwards, Eunomia
June 5, 2026

Mass balance is a critical piece of the recycling puzzle—and one that's important to get right.

Circular Materials to supply PlasCred chem recycling plant

Circular Materials to supply PlasCred chem recycling plant

byAntoinette Smith
June 4, 2026

The planned chemical recycling plant in Alberta, Canada, also has a five-year, fixed price offtake contract, ahead of reaching a...

In My Opinion: Comparing the nation’s first packaging EPR laws

What Maine’s vape EPR law means for recyclers

byStefanie Valentic
June 4, 2026

Maine is the first state to require vape manufacturers to fund end-of-life management for their products. Vape recycler Michael Duckworth...

Load More
Next Post
Ingram Micro building exterior.

Partnership model helps firm expand ITAD globally

More Posts

Industry announcements for January 2026

Industry announcements for June 2026

June 1, 2026
California extends compostable labeling law

California bills crack down on false recycling, compostable claims

May 29, 2026

Three-bill package aims to revamp Michigan’s bottle return system

June 9, 2026
House resolution aims to make recyclability central to product design

NY EPR bill fails to advance after third try

June 8, 2026
Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

May 27, 2026
How electronics legislation fared this legislative season

NY sends repairability labeling bill to governor

June 8, 2026
War, not demand driving polymer pricing

War, not demand driving polymer pricing

June 2, 2026
Packaging policy is not one-size-fits-all

Packaging policy is not one-size-fits-all

June 1, 2026
Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

May 26, 2026
Data to verify recycling for Indy 500

Data to verify recycling for Indy 500

May 22, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.