Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Plastics

California data shows PCR backsliding among major brands

byJared Paben
September 29, 2021
in Plastics
Expect more PET recycling investments from Indorama
Data from California shows some major beverage producers used lower percentages of post-consumer resin in 2020 than they did in 2019. | tezzstock / Shutterstock
The clock is ticking on California’s law mandating recycled plastic in drink bottles, and some beverage producers still have a long way to go, newly released data reveals.

California officials posted plastic usage reports showing that some major beverage producers, including Coca-Cola North America, Niagara Bottling, PepsiCo Bottling Group and Nestle Waters US, actually used lower percentages of post-consumer resin (PCR) in 2020 than they did in 2019, the year before COVID-19 struck North America.

And the documents show a number of other well-known brand names continued using zero recycled plastic last year.

Meanwhile, the Golden State’s recycled-content requirements are fast approaching. Passed and signed into law last year, Assembly Bill 793 mandates that all plastic bottles covered by the state’s container redemption program average at least 15% PCR starting in 2022. That mandate increases to 25% in 2025 and 50% in 2030.

Many major drink makers are already exceeding the 15% PCR mandate – some by significant margins – but others are way short. The following are 2020 (and 2019 comparison data when available) PET numbers from California beverage producers using at least 1 million pounds of PET and some level of PCR (organized by largest plastic user to smallest): 

Coca-Cola North America: 171.57 million pounds of total PET, 10% of which was PCR (down from 19% in 2019).

Niagara Bottling (also a private label producer for Walmart, Safeway, Costco and others): 130.86 million pounds, 20% PCR (down from 35% the year before).

Pepsi Cola Bottling Group: 97.30 million pounds, 18% PCR (down from 20%).

CG Roxane-Crystal Geyser Alpine Spring Water: 50.69 million pounds, 37% PCR (up from 20%). 

Nestle Waters US: 48.07 million pounds, 33% PCR (down from 36%).

Premium Waters (also a private label producer): 8.05 million pounds, 72% PCR (up from 0% PCR).

Hydration Source (water producer): 3.84 million pounds, 12% PCR (up from 0.3%).

Chameleon Beverage (water producer): 2.06 million pounds, 48% PCR (up from 47%).

Danone Waters of America: 1.60 million pounds, 23% PCR (up from 20%).

Dolgen California (owner of Dollar General stores): 1.29 million pounds, 11% PCR (down from 17%).

The following are companies that used at least 1 million pounds of virgin PET but reported either zero PCR used or omitted PCR data entirely (ordered from largest to smallest plastic user): 

  • BA Sports Nutrition (owner of the Body Armor drink brand): 42.63 million pounds.
  • American Bottling (Dr Pepper Snapple Group’s wholly owned bottler): 19.13 million pounds.
  • Crystal Geyser Water Co. (sparkling water producer that operates independent of CG Roxane but has some shared ownership interest): 7.12 million pounds.
  • Lassonde Pappas and Company: 4.63 million pounds.
  • Mott’s: 4.39 million pounds.
  • FIJI Water: 4.16 million pounds.
  • Unix Packaging: 3.59 million pounds.
  • Arizona Beverages USA: 2.93 million pounds.
  • Langer Juice Co.: 2.05 million pounds.
  • Refresco Beverages US (independent bottler): 1.05 million pounds.

Under AB 793, starting in 2023, manufacturers that miss the PCR targets are subject to penalty fees of 20 cents for each pound of PCR they fall short, although the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) can reduce the penalties based on certain factors. 

Starting in 2025, the CalRecycle director has the authority to lower the recycled-content targets either of their own accord or after receiving a petition from beverage manufacturers. The law doesn’t allow the director to lower the targets before 2025, however. 

It’s unknown whether the downfall of nationwide PET reclaimer CarbonLite, which had its headquarters and first plant in the Los Angeles area, played into RPET usage decreases in 2020. Niagara, Nestle Waters and PepsiCo were among CarbonLite’s customers, some of which decreased or canceled their RPET purchases after CarbonLite unilaterally increased its resin prices. CarbonLite CEO Leon Farahnik previously told Plastics Recycling Update that COVID-19 closures also reduced the amount of deposit containers being redeemed in the state, squeezing feedstock supply for CarbonLite.  

California’s recycled-content requirements are relatively new, and they may inspire other states to pass similar laws. Washington state already has. 

But the requirement that beverage producers disclose their recycled-plastic usage in California goes back several years. Assembly Bill 2530, passed and signed into law in 2016, began requiring producers of beverages in the state’s container deposit program to annually disclose the amount of virgin and recycled plastic they used in California starting in 2017. CalRecycle has posted the data online for the public to see. 

Over the years, producers have submitted a wide array of numbers with little consistency. Some report pounds, others report kilograms and others submit data in tons, without indicating whether they’re short or metric tons. Some companies report PRC percentages but not weights, and still others submit forms with little to no information. 

For the 2020 data, however, CalRecycle staff adjusted the submittals to provide some standardization, converting all numbers to pounds. That allows for easier comparisons between companies and from year to year. 
 

Tags: Brand OwnersCaliforniaLegislation & EnforcementPET
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

Newsom nixes recycled content claims bill

Newsom nixes recycled content claims bill

byAntoinette Smith
September 28, 2026

Supporters of AB 2253 said the bill would address greenwashing, while opponents said it demonized mass-balance accounting and didn't reflect...

NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

byEdward Kosior
September 28, 2026

In this editorial, Prof. Edward Kosior explores how policy uncertainty discourages investment and risks destroying existing recycling capacity.

Analysis: Undersupply of PCR is ‘stifling’ brand goals

US lawmakers urge protection of domestic RPET

byAntoinette Smith
September 25, 2026

In a letter to the US Trade Representative, five representatives asked the USTR to consider trade remedies and support verification...

Oregon state capitol building with state flag and blue sky.

NAW appeals Oregon EPR ruling

byStefanie Valentic
September 25, 2026

NAW is challenging an Oregon judge's ruling in favor of the state's extended producer responsibility law.

Bipartisan reps introduce bill on recycling claims

House passes bill to ease lithium-ion battery storage rules

byStefanie Valentic
September 24, 2026

The BRACE Act would let lithium-ion battery recyclers store batteries on site under universal waste rules and give EPA 18...

Calif. Governor Gavin Newsom at podium.

Newsom signs battery EPR expansion, vetoes SB 54 fund bill

byStefanie Valentic
September 24, 2026

Newsom signed a battery EPR expansion and a nitrous oxide sales ban but vetoed a bill setting spending rules for...

Load More
Next Post

News from Global Electronics Council, Northwestern University and more

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

Ten e-scrap projects receive federal prize funds

Recycling rates for rare earths could double by 2040

July 17, 2026
Closeup of a printed circuitboard

Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

June 5, 2026
Data erasure firm expands wearable device capabilities

Apple hits 30% recycled content, debuts new recovery tech

April 17, 2026
Apple store

Apple leads on inputs, faces questions on ITAD

May 1, 2026

In other news: May 2, 2016

May 2, 2016

Microsoft confirms PC sales slump

August 4, 2026

America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

September 18, 2026
Intel sign outside of company building.

Intel’s CapEx tops $20B on server demand while PC volume shrinks

July 29, 2026

AI and the changing economics of retired hardware

June 12, 2026
Textile EPR and the definition of recycling

Textile Exchange reports progress in production

September 22, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazines

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletters

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazines
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.