Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

California data shows PCR backsliding among major brands

byJared Paben
October 5, 2021
in Recycling
Data from California shows some major beverage producers used lower percentages of post-consumer resin in 2020 than they did in 2019. | tezzstock / Shutterstock

The clock is ticking on California’s law mandating recycled plastic in drink bottles, and some beverage producers still have a long way to go, newly released data reveals.

California officials posted plastic usage reports showing that some major beverage producers, including Coca-Cola North America, Niagara Bottling, PepsiCo Bottling Group and Nestle Waters US, actually used lower percentages of post-consumer resin (PCR) in 2020 than they did in 2019, the year before COVID-19 struck North America.

And the documents show a number of other well-known brand names continued using zero recycled plastic last year.

Meanwhile, the Golden State’s recycled-content requirements are fast approaching. Passed and signed into law last year, Assembly Bill 793 mandates that all plastic bottles covered by the state’s container redemption program average at least 15% PCR starting in 2022. That mandate increases to 25% in 2025 and 50% in 2030.

Many major drink makers are already exceeding the 15% PCR mandate – some by significant margins – but others are way short. The following are 2020 (and 2019 comparison data when available) PET numbers from California beverage producers using at least 1 million pounds of PET and some level of PCR (organized by largest plastic user to smallest): 

Coca-Cola North America: 171.57 million pounds of total PET, 10% of which was PCR (down from 19% in 2019).

Niagara Bottling (also a private label producer for Walmart, Safeway, Costco and others): 130.86 million pounds, 20% PCR (down from 35% the year before).

Pepsi Cola Bottling Group: 97.30 million pounds, 18% PCR (down from 20%).

CG Roxane-Crystal Geyser Alpine Spring Water: 50.69 million pounds, 37% PCR (up from 20%). 

Nestle Waters US: 48.07 million pounds, 33% PCR (down from 36%).

Premium Waters (also a private label producer): 8.05 million pounds, 72% PCR (up from 0% PCR).

Hydration Source (water producer): 3.84 million pounds, 12% PCR (up from 0.3%).

Chameleon Beverage (water producer): 2.06 million pounds, 48% PCR (up from 47%).

Danone Waters of America: 1.60 million pounds, 23% PCR (up from 20%).

Dolgen California (owner of Dollar General stores): 1.29 million pounds, 11% PCR (down from 17%).

The following are companies that used at least 1 million pounds of virgin PET but reported either zero PCR used or omitted PCR data entirely (ordered from largest to smallest plastic user): 

  • BA Sports Nutrition (owner of the Body Armor drink brand): 42.63 million pounds.
  • American Bottling (Dr Pepper Snapple Group’s wholly owned bottler): 19.13 million pounds.
  • Crystal Geyser Water Co. (sparkling water producer that operates independent of CG Roxane but has some shared ownership interest): 7.12 million pounds.
  • Lassonde Pappas and Company: 4.63 million pounds.
  • Mott’s: 4.39 million pounds.
  • FIJI Water: 4.16 million pounds.
  • Unix Packaging: 3.59 million pounds.
  • Arizona Beverages USA: 2.93 million pounds.
  • Langer Juice Co.: 2.05 million pounds.
  • Refresco Beverages US (independent bottler): 1.05 million pounds.

Under AB 793, starting in 2023, manufacturers that miss the PCR targets are subject to penalty fees of 20 cents for each pound of PCR they fall short, although the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) can reduce the penalties based on certain factors. 

Starting in 2025, the CalRecycle director has the authority to lower the recycled-content targets either of their own accord or after receiving a petition from beverage manufacturers. The law doesn’t allow the director to lower the targets before 2025, however. 

It’s unknown whether the downfall of nationwide PET reclaimer CarbonLite, which had its headquarters and first plant in the Los Angeles area, played into RPET usage decreases in 2020. Niagara, Nestle Waters and PepsiCo were among CarbonLite’s customers, some of which decreased or canceled their RPET purchases after CarbonLite unilaterally increased its resin prices. CarbonLite CEO Leon Farahnik previously told Resource Recycling that COVID-19 closures also reduced the amount of deposit containers being redeemed in the state, squeezing feedstock supply for CarbonLite.  

California’s recycled-content requirements are relatively new, and they may inspire other states to pass similar laws. Washington state already has. 

But the requirement that beverage producers disclose their recycled-plastic usage in California goes back several years. Assembly Bill 2530, passed and signed into law in 2016, began requiring producers of beverages in the state’s container deposit program to annually disclose the amount of virgin and recycled plastic they used in California starting in 2017. CalRecycle has posted the data online for the public to see. 

Over the years, producers have submitted a wide array of numbers with little consistency. Some report pounds, others report kilograms and others submit data in tons, without indicating whether they’re short or metric tons. Some companies report PRC percentages but not weights, and still others submit forms with little to no information. 

For the 2020 data, however, CalRecycle staff adjusted the submittals to provide some standardization, converting all numbers to pounds. That allows for easier comparisons between companies and from year to year. 

A version of this story appeared in Plastics Recycling Update on September 29.
 

Tags: Brand OwnersPlastics
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

CPG Henkel raises PCR targets for 2030

byAntoinette Smith
April 16, 2026

Despite falling slightly short of 2025 goals, the Germany-based consumer brand aims to increase the share of recycled plastic in...

UNIQLO expands textile recycling effort to LA, Dallas

byScott Snowden
March 31, 2026

UNIQLO, WM and Piece of Cake expanded a clothing collection program to Los Angeles and Dallas, building on a New...

Unilever shifting focus to flexibles targets

Unilever shifting focus to flexibles targets

byAntoinette Smith
March 23, 2026

The global brand hit its target of 25% PCR use in packaging last year, but will increase work on substituting...

Fireside Chat at PRC features CAA chief

Fireside Chat at PRC features CAA chief

byAntoinette Smith
March 4, 2026

The CEOs of the Association of Plastic Recyclers and Circular Action Alliance held a candid, spirited discussion at the 2026...

State policy is redefining plastics recycling in the US

State policy is redefining plastics recycling in the US

byKate Bailey
February 19, 2026

This year marks the midpoint of a decade defined by major shifts in plastics and recycling policy. Here’s what to...

PP cups now ‘widely recyclable’ with increased acceptance

byAntoinette Smith
February 3, 2026

With more than 60% of US households having access to curbside recycling collection for PP to-go drink cups, the How2Recycle...

Load More
Next Post

Report examines how to boost recycling markets in Texas

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling
Sponsored

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling

byThe Battery Network
April 13, 2026

We’re connecting people, brands, and communities through one nationwide network built to make battery recycling safer, simpler, and more accessible...

Read moreDetails

More Posts

Policy Now | December 2025 – Year-end nears, policy talks continue

Policy Now | December 2025 – Year-end nears, policy talks continue

December 1, 2025

Certification scorecard – Week of March 23, 2026

March 24, 2026

Amazon, DOE partner on critical materials recovery

April 13, 2026
Miami-Dade backs pilots to grow organics diversion and composting

Miami-Dade backs pilots to grow organics diversion and composting

December 8, 2025
Basel e-scrap rules disrupt larger metal sector

Basel e-scrap rules disrupt larger metal sector

June 26, 2025
Fresh round of plastic treaty talks kick off in Geneva

Fresh round of plastic treaty talks kick off in Geneva

August 6, 2025

Study details ‘transformational’ tech in plastics recycling

April 10, 2019

Full plastic bag ban passes California Senate

June 4, 2024

AI surge, dealmaking reshape  ITAD industry 

April 16, 2026
Aduro losses nearly double on year

Aduro losses nearly double on year

April 15, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.