Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Resource Recycling Magazine

First-person perspective: Key developments in California’s plastic laws

bySedina Banks, Sherry Jackman and Bryce Lourié
May 15, 2025
in Resource Recycling Magazine
Nareeta Martin/Unsplash

California continues to be a leader in sustainability with the passage of a series of laws aimed at increasing diversion, waste reduction and consumer knowledge.

SB 54

In 2022, California enacted Senate Bill 54, or the Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act. SB 54 is an extended producer responsibility law aimed at reducing plastic and packaging waste and shifting the cost of recycling this material from the consumer back to the producer. This is done primarily by establishing a framework for development of a producer responsibility organization, an entity which producers join and pay fees to. The PRO then implements and funds waste management, recycling and reduction practices. Circular Action Alliance was selected as the PRO for California and other states.

Additionally, SB 54 mandates that certain sustainability and plastic reduction thresholds be met in the coming years:

  • 25% reduction in all single-use plastic packaging and single-use plastic cutlery, plates, cups and containers by 2032.
  • 65% recycling rate for all single-use plastic packaging and the same types of single-use plastic food serviceware by 2032.
  • 100% of single-use packaging (including non-plastics like glass, ceramic, metal, paper and fiber, and wood and other organics) and single-use plastic food serviceware must be recyclable or compostable by 2032.

Smaller steps toward these goals are required for the years leading up to 2032. For example, single-use plastic packaging and single-use plastic food ware must be reduced by 10% by 2027 and 20% by 2030. Importantly, the 25% reduction and 65% recycling rate requirements only apply to plastic items, while the general requirement that all single-use packaging be recyclable or compostable by 2032 applies to any packaging material covered by the statute.

In order for producers and the PRO to work toward these requirements, the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, the state agency in charge of implementing SB 54, was tasked with establishing a Covered Material Category list to establish which materials are recyclable and compostable at the requisite levels. CalRecycle released its first CMC list on Dec. 28, 2023, and updated it on Jan. 1, 2025. This list helps producers and the PRO determine which materials will meet California’s standards and which materials they need to phase out.

Over the last few years, industry groups, environmental advocates, regulators, lawmakers and the PRO have been working together to determine how the law will be implemented.

On March 7, 2025, the deadline to finalize regulations for SB 54, Gov. Gavin Newsom told CalRecycle to restart the regulatory rulemaking process for SB 54 due to concerns about the potential costs to businesses and consumers. Now that Newsom has ordered negotiators back to the drawing board, it is unclear how and if broader deadlines in the statute will be met.

As it stands, in California, the first major deadline for producers is Jan. 1, 2027. By this date, producers must both join a PRO and reduce single-use plastic packaging and single-use plastic foodware by 10%. Both the PRO and California lawmakers have stated that the statutory timelines remain in effect despite setbacks for regulations.

SB 343

In 2021, the year before SB 54 was enacted, California adopted SB 343, or the “Truth in Recycling” law. This law seeks to give consumers “accurate and useful information related to how to properly handle the end of life of a product or packaging,” primarily through creating stricter requirements for when companies can use the familiar “chasing arrows” symbol or any other indicator of recyclability on products and packaging.

The law requires a minimum demonstrated level of actual recycling for various materials before they can be labeled as recyclable. To this end, SB 343 directed CalRecycle to conduct research and publish data on the materials collected, sorted, sold or transferred for recycling in California, including whether the materials meet recyclability thresholds. Manufacturers and other interested parties can then use the data to determine whether compliant recyclable claims can be made. CalRecycle published its final Material Characterization Study report on April 4, 2025, and manufacturers are required to comply with labeling requirements based on data in this report starting Oct. 4, 2026.

SB 343 and SB 54 are parallel laws. While SB 343 restricts labeling products as recyclable unless certain threshold levels of recycling are met, SB 54 simultaneously mandates that California work toward meeting those thresholds. Additionally, the CMC list for SB 54 is built from the findings of the SB 343 Material Characterization Study.

Other EPR Laws

Outside of California, other states across the nation are prioritizing waste reduction with their own EPR laws, including:

  • Maine: Stewardship program for packaging material, Maine Rev. Stat. § 2146 (2021).
  • Oregon: Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act, SB 582 (2021).
  • Colorado: Producer Responsibility Program for Statewide Recycling Act, House Bill 22-1355 (2022).
  • Minnesota: Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act, HF 3911 (2024).

Key Takeaways

SB 54 and SB 343 set ambitious goals for California, and it is not clear that the state is on track to meet them. Because these laws have important deadlines and milestones in the coming months and years, businesses affected by them should stay informed. Registering with CAA, California’s PRO, can help businesses ensure they are receiving the most current information.

We expect that more state EPR laws will be passed in the near future. Prudent businesses that operate nationally should make sure to keep up with these laws to remain compliant in this ever-changing landscape. Competent environmental counsel may be required to navigate these innovative laws.

Sedina L. Banks, Sherry E. Jackman and Bryce Lourié are attorneys in the Environmental Group at Los Angeles-based Greenberg Glusker and specialize in advising clients on complex regulatory compliance matters and litigation.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Resource Recycling, Inc. If you have a subject you wish to cover in an op-ed, please send a short proposal to news@dev.resource-recycling.com for consideration.

TweetShare
Sedina Banks, Sherry Jackman and Bryce Lourié

Sedina Banks, Sherry Jackman and Bryce Lourié

Related Posts

Newsom nixes recycled content claims bill

Newsom nixes recycled content claims bill

byAntoinette Smith
September 28, 2026

Supporters of AB 2253 said the bill would address greenwashing, while opponents said it demonized mass-balance accounting and didn't reflect...

NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

byEdward Kosior
September 28, 2026

In this editorial, Prof. Edward Kosior explores how policy uncertainty discourages investment and risks destroying existing recycling capacity.

trash bags

Sorted: Should we use recycled trash bags?

byBrian Clark Howard
September 28, 2026

Manufacturers’ resistance is rooted in performance and cost, but the products may have an important role to play.

Analysis: Undersupply of PCR is ‘stifling’ brand goals

US lawmakers urge protection of domestic RPET

byAntoinette Smith
September 25, 2026

In a letter to the US Trade Representative, five representatives asked the USTR to consider trade remedies and support verification...

Oregon state capitol building with state flag and blue sky.

NAW appeals Oregon EPR ruling

byStefanie Valentic
September 25, 2026

NAW is challenging an Oregon judge's ruling in favor of the state's extended producer responsibility law.

Cutting healthcare plastics could save $18B

Report provides path to reduce medical e-scrap

byPaul Lane
September 25, 2026

The European report found that circularity in medical devices is possible through several potential initiatives.

Load More
Next Post

Textile recycling enters the fold

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

September 23, 2026
Oregon state capitol building with state flag and blue sky.

NAW appeals Oregon EPR ruling

September 25, 2026
Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

September 24, 2026
Calif. Governor Gavin Newsom at podium.

Newsom signs battery EPR expansion, vetoes SB 54 fund bill

September 24, 2026

Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

September 21, 2026
Bipartisan reps introduce bill on recycling claims

House passes bill to ease lithium-ion battery storage rules

September 24, 2026
Analysis: Undersupply of PCR is ‘stifling’ brand goals

US lawmakers urge protection of domestic RPET

September 25, 2026
US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

September 16, 2026
Industry announcements for January 2026

Industry announcements for September 2026

August 31, 2026
Bridge Green, Hartree partner on mineral processing deal

Bridge Green, Hartree partner on mineral processing deal

September 21, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazines

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletters

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazines
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.