Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    ITAD is moving past its adolescent phase: beyond end-of-life

    Rainforest

    Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

    Closeup of a printed circuitboard

    Hardware demand puts new focus on parts harvesting

    Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

    Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

    Certification Scorecard — Week of June 1, 2026

    IT asset disposition and electronics recycling: Now and then

    $60 billion in AI servers will create an ITAD challenge

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Why Oregon may see greater e-scrap collections in 2023

byJared Paben
April 14, 2022
in E-Scrap
Why Oregon may see greater e-scrap collections in 2023
Oregon state e-scrap program leaders shared their 2023 collection targets during a recent webinar. | JPL Designs/Shutterstock

E-scrap collections have trended sharply downward for the past several years, but there is reason to believe the weight entering Oregon’s program may slightly increase next year, state officials explained.

State program leaders on April 13 held a webinar to discuss their initial predictions for e-scrap weight entering the Oregon E-Cycles program in 2023. The 13-year-old extended producer responsibility (EPR) program covers computers, monitors, TVs, printers and computer peripherals such as keyboards and mice.

Drawing around 60 people, the webinar was held as the DEQ explores significant changes to the state program, which is one of the oldest electronics EPR programs in the country. In coming months, officials will gather input from stakeholders and recommend statutory changes to lawmakers. Those changes will be included in a bill considered during the 2023 legislative session.

“One of the things that has become clear over time is that we need to take another look at this law,” said Cheryl Grabham, Materials Management Program manager at DEQ.

Falling collections may level out

The statewide collection and recycling targets, which are based on a number of data points, have been falling since 2015, when they hit a high of 30.5 million pounds. Last year, the target was 12.80 million pounds and the program collected 14.07 million pounds. For 2022, the target is 11.5 million pounds.

“The electronics ecosystem is changing,” said DEQ’s Martin Brown, who ran lots of numbers to develop collection predictions for 2023. “We all feel and know that electronics are becoming a bigger and bigger part of our lives, but in terms of the sheer weight of electronic waste that is being created or collected, that number has actually been going down.”

Oregon DEQ developed a draft collection range for 2023 of between 12.2 million pounds and 15.8 million pounds, with the average just shy of 14 million pounds.

Brown, who is a goals and measures specialist at DEQ’s Materials Management Program, explained that the low-end estimate is an extrapolation of historical collection trends. The high estimate uses the historical trends but also incorporates ambitious adjustments based on factors such as COVID-19. For example, the virus spread initially resulted in a deep dip in collections. As the pandemic lingered over the following two years, it drove demand for new electronics, especially PCs.

“Participants in industry feel like there will be some echo of that in electronics collection in the future as older devices get retired,” Brown said.

Meanwhile, years ago, researchers at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) developed a material flow model predicting the e-scrap weight available in Oregon through 2023. For TVs, the model suggests “there may be a few more available for collection in 2023 than are suggested by the historical trend,” Brown said.

During the webinar, Walter Alcorn, vice president of environmental affairs and industry sustainability at the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), called Oregon DEQ’s work “some of the most technically sophisticated approaches on how to do this projection.”

“So thank you for taking this seriously,” he said.

DEQ is accepting public comments on its draft collection determination for 2023. Comments can be emailed to ecycle.info@deq.oregon.gov by 5 p.m. on April 25.

Changes to the law envisioned

The collection determination is important because an unrealistically high number means producer responsibility organizations (PROs) won’t be able to collect enough material to meet the target, exposing them to possible penalties, but setting it too low can result in reductions in the collection network, as PROs work to ensure they don’t over-collect and outstrip their budgets.

The latter happened recently, resulting in the loss of a handful of collection sites and drawing the attention of legislators. Grabham said the situation moved updating Oregon E-Cycles up DEQ’s priority list.

DEQ plans to hold stakeholder meetings in June and/or July to gather feedback on changes to the program. That feedback would be submitted to the Legislative Counsel in August or September. The bill would be considered during the 2023 session, which starts in January and is anticipated to last 160 days.

The changes could include moving away from a reliance on weight-based targets, a step suggested by RIT professor Callie Babbitt, who has researched the evolving electronics stream. In a 2020 paper titled “The Evolution of Consumer Electronic Waste in the United States,” which was published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology, she and fellow researchers Shahana Althaf and Roger Chen suggested shifting e-scrap management priorities from “mass” to “materials” and from “waste diversion” to “resource retention.”

During the DEQ webinar, David McCall, solid waste program manager in Oregon’s Tillamook County, said that as devices get lighter and lighter, it’s important to have the number of pieces counted by the Oregon E-Cycles program, not just weights measured.
 

Tags: EPR
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

House resolution aims to make recyclability central to product design

NY EPR bill fails to advance after third try

byStefanie Valentic
June 8, 2026

This marks the third session in which the bill cleared the Senate only to stall in the Assembly.

Rainforest

Inside the Circle: What the rainforest can teach us about EPR

byBill Shireman
June 8, 2026

We have a lot to learn from jungles, particularly as we fight the thorny problem of plastic pollution.

CalRecycle withdraws proposed regs for SB 54

Oceana, NRDC, CAW sue CalRecycle over SB 54 regs

byStefanie Valentic
June 5, 2026

The groups allege that the new regulations have too many loopholes for packaging producers.

Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

Mass balance matters: Why different rules can lead to different outcomes 

bySarah Edwards, Eunomia
June 5, 2026

Mass balance is a critical piece of the recycling puzzle—and one that's important to get right.

Circular Materials to supply PlasCred chem recycling plant

Circular Materials to supply PlasCred chem recycling plant

byAntoinette Smith
June 4, 2026

The planned chemical recycling plant in Alberta, Canada, also has a five-year, fixed price offtake contract, ahead of reaching a...

In My Opinion: Comparing the nation’s first packaging EPR laws

What Maine’s vape EPR law means for recyclers

byStefanie Valentic
June 4, 2026

Maine is the first state to require vape manufacturers to fund end-of-life management for their products. Vape recycler Michael Duckworth...

Load More
Next Post
Policymakers ponder recycling’s role in ‘critical mineral’ supply

Policymakers ponder recycling's role in 'critical mineral' supply

More Posts

Industry announcements for January 2026

Industry announcements for June 2026

June 1, 2026
House resolution aims to make recyclability central to product design

NY EPR bill fails to advance after third try

June 8, 2026
California extends compostable labeling law

California bills crack down on false recycling, compostable claims

May 29, 2026
Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

May 27, 2026

Three-bill package aims to revamp Michigan’s bottle return system

June 9, 2026
How electronics legislation fared this legislative season

NY sends repairability labeling bill to governor

June 8, 2026
War, not demand driving polymer pricing

War, not demand driving polymer pricing

June 2, 2026
Packaging policy is not one-size-fits-all

Packaging policy is not one-size-fits-all

June 1, 2026

Returns are a goldmine of information

May 27, 2026
Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

May 26, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.